Giro: Midweek Check-in and Questions

Pavé would like to thank Laekhouse for supporting our coverage of the 2011 Giro d’Italia.

Fotoreporter Sirotti

While it’s been overshadowed by the death of Wouter Weylandt, the first several stages of the 2011 Giro have had plenty of excitement to offer. Stage 5, over the Strade Bianchi, was won by Peter Weening, who bridged to the break of the day – BMC’s Kohler – with AG2R’s John Gadret before attacking both and soloing in, despite pedaling squares up the final climb. Behind him, savvy GC candidates treated it like a tough, Italian one-day, fighting to stay at the front as a few riders (Thomas Lofkvist of Sky and Michele Scarponi of Lampre) attacked and splintered the field. Most of the GC candidates finished in the front group eight seconds behind Weening, including Vincenzo Nibali, Alberto Contador, Scarponi, Joaquim Rodrigues, Roman Kreuziger, Denis Menchov, Igor Anton.

Can Igor Anton redeem his bad luck from the Vuelta? Last year, he won two stages but crashed out while wearing the leader’s jersey. What are his chances for a podium finish?

Notably absent from the finishing group on Stage 5 was Carlos Sastre, who finished :28 behind. He also lost time on the team time trial on Stage 1 and after flatting on Stage 3. He now sits over 2:00 behind the leader on the GC, and about a 1:30 behind top GC contenders Nibali and Contador. Is this a perfect sign of Sastre’s complete and utter inability to compete for the GC of Grand Tours? He does them backwards – rather than gain time at every opportunity, the rule of thumb of stage races, he seems to lose time on fairly innocuous stages, putting himself behind the 8-ball early. With Menchov within :30 of Nibali and Contador, expect Geox to ride for Menchov, and Sastre to continue losing time until he’s got a long enough leash to go for a stage win. Geox could really use a big victory.

Speaking of needing a big victory, will Katusha gun for stage wins, or go all-in on Rodriguez’s GC hopes? It seems as if they need to do both – somehow – to salvage their season at this point, without spreading themselves too thin. Can they redeem themselves?

Stage 4’s neutralization reduced the already few opportunites for sprinters to compete with each other. Stage 2 saw some Petacchi/Cavendish drama, which is as fine an opportunity as ever to link to Cyclocosm.com‘s terrific video, The Rules of the Bunch Sprint. With Friday’s Stage 7 ending on a climb, Saturday’s Stage 8 will be an opportunity for Mark Cavendish to let his legs do the talking – though now that he’s on Twitter, he’s got one more opporunity to let his mouth do as much (or more) talking as his legs.

How long will it be before Mark Cavendish withdraws?

Next Friday, Saturday, and Sunday capture the Giro in a nutshell – three brutal, major mountain stages, back-to-back, without a rest day interrupting them. Hopefully it will make for good viewing, but as two of the stages thus far have been marked by solo breakaways – Sebastian Lang of Omega Pharma-Lotto on Stage 2, and BMC’s Martin Kohler on Stage 5 – it seems like many riders are a bit confused still as to how to race this Giro d’Italia.

With so few sprint stages in this year’s Giro, we wonder what will come of the many hilly stages – will long-shot, top-ten GC hopefuls make daring moves and animate the racing? Or will the riders race conservatively, knowing that there are brutal stages to come?

Many teams have brought their B-Squad, saving their A-team for a Tour de France without Alberto Contador. This may lead to some young up-and-coming opportunists racing hard for outside chances at top-ten placings or stage wins. Who are you keeping your eye on? I’ll be paying attention to Radioshack’s young pair of Tiago Machado and Bjorn Selander, Sky’s prodigy Thomas Lofkvist, and Tour Down Under winner (and multiple Track World Champion) Cameron Meyer. Who are you watching at the Giro?

Posted in Featured, Races | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Discuss: Voeckler or Gilbert?

Fotoreporter Sirotti

 

By winning Stage 4 and the overall title at last weeks 4 Days of Dunkirk, Thomas Voeckler took his seventh and eighth wins of the season–giving him one more than Philippe Gilbert*. This got me thinking: is Voeckler better? More exciting? None or both of the above? How do you think he would fare were he to race the same program as the Belgian superstar?

Discuss.

*Interestingly, Voeckler’s not the most successful rider thus far this season. Can you find out who it is without resorting to a results database?

Posted in Featured, Musette | Tagged , , | 17 Comments

The Sticky Bidon – May 11, 2011

Photo Courtesy RCS Sport


Interesting cycling items from across the Internet, May 11, 2011

Seen any cool links we missed? Share ’em in the comments below!

Posted in Featured, Sticky Bidon | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Sticky Bidon – May 10, 2011

Fotoreporter Sirotti

Interesting cycling items from across the Internet, May 10, 2011

Seen any cool links we missed? Share ’em in the comments below!

Posted in Featured, Sticky Bidon | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tuesday Musette – Giro, Dunkirk, and the NFL

Pavé would like to thank Laekhouse for supporting our coverage of the 2011 Giro d’Italia.

Fotoreporter Sirotti

 

Here’s what was on our minds prior to yesterday’s tragedy at the Giro d’Italia:

1. The Giro opened Saturday with HTC-High Road winning the 19.3 team time trial in Torino. As expected, Marco Pinotti was the recipient of the race’s first maglia rosa, an emotional moment that obviously meant a lot to the Italian National ITT Champion.

Of the main contenders for the overall victory, Vicenzo Nibali’s Liquigas team had the best day, finishing third and giving Nibali an early edge on his rivals. While time gaps were small to men such as Lampre’s Michele Scarponi (2-seconds) and Saxo Bank’s Alberto Contador (8-seconds), other men such as Geox-TMC’s Denis Menchov and Carlos Sastre, Katusha’s Joaquin Rodriguez, and Euskaltel’s Igor Anton all lost over 30-seconds. While not insurmountable, every little bit helps.

2. Speaking of Anton, he’s now claiming that he’s not in Italy to make a run for the GC. Which in my book, all but proves that he is.

3. And speaking of every little bit helps—or hurts—Carlos Sastre lost another 53-seconds to the rest of the overall favorites yesterday. While harmful to the Spaniard’s overall prospects, a bit more of a gap might help his chances to take a stage win or two.

4. As for Sunday’s second stage, Alessandro Petacchi has apparently discovered the fountain of youth, winning both the stage and the points jersey. Right now, Petacchi seems to be the only rider in the world not especially intimidated by HTC’s Mark Cavendish (Sunday’s recipient of the pink jersey after placing second to Petacchi in the field sprint).  A mind game more than anything else, winning field sprints is one area where a mental edge can make more of difference than just about anything else. And while I have no doubt Cavendish will win his share of stages, Petacchi’s clearly his top challenger.

5. In Dunkirk, Thomas Voeckler is probably the best cyclist that nobody talks about. With an aggressive ride to win Stage 4 of the French HC event, Voeckler took over the pink jersey as race leader and defended it Sunday to earn his eighth win of the season—one more than Philippe Gilbert.

The current leader of the UCI’s Europe Tour, the French Champion seems to have an affinity for collecting jerseys—a trend he’ll look to continue in France this summer. His run makes even more glaring the fact that his Europcar team was omitted from the Ardennes Classics—one has to wonder if he would have had the legs to challenge Gilbert’s supremacy. (I doubt it, but it would have been fun to see anyway.)

6. As for Skil-Shimano’s Marcel Kittel, the young German won every stage of the 5-day event—except for the one that mattered. Regardless, 4 out of 5 stages is an impressive haul for any 22-year-old. I wonder how long before he signs with HTC.

7. And now for a topic we tend to avoid here at Pavé—not because we’re blind to it, but simply because it’s so heavily covered by everyone else. The National [American] Football League (NFL), in a new attempt to try and break the bargaining stalemate that threatens to jeopardize the 2011 season, is now rumored to be contemplating handing over the testing of its athletes to WADA. Go figure.

Personally, I have long been frustrated by the glaring hypocrisy of most American sports fans’ attitudes regarding doping. In the USA, a football player is a hero for getting a shot of cortisone at halftime and returning to lead his team to victory in the second half, while a cyclist is a dirty cheater for using the wrong kind of antiseptic gel and testing positive. I’m not saying that cyclists deserve to be idolized when they cheat, but I do feel that all drug testing in all sports need to be treated the same.

I’ll be watching this situation closely. Should it go through, Major League Baseball might be next—the testing of minor leaguers is up to the league office, but in the major leagues, testing has to be bargained.

And then there’s FIFA. I’m not touching that with a ten-meter pole.

8. Last, but not least, if you have the time and the money to spare, here’s a unique opportunity to get an intimate, behind-the-scenes look at the life of an aspiring professional team. It’s an interesting concept—let us know if you decide to check it out.

Enjoy the rest of your week—share your comments below.

Posted in Featured, Musette | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

2011 Classics Awards, Part 2

Photo by Luc Claessen/ISPA Photo


With the Giro d’Italia underway, our biggest party of the year, the Spring Classics, is over. We thought it would be fitting that in lieu of bestowing Rider of the Month (which we have probably already made quite clear) and Team of the Month, as we are accustomed to publishing, we could commemorate such a spectacular set of races with a series of awards. We published Part 1 last week. Here are the remaining picks for Pavé’s Classics Awards:

Best Unsung Hero

The Classics are a time for the stars to shine, but nowhere is there greater evidence of the need for the quiet heroes than in the performance of one of the great champions of the sport, Fabian Cancellara. Without crucial support, he found himself alone for key moments of big races, outnumbered by his opponents. Two riders receive the award for Best Unsung Hero: Sep Vanmarcke of Garmin-Cervelo, and Jelle Vanendert of Omega Pharma-Lotto. If Johan Vansummeren’s win at Paris-Roubaix win owes much to the strength of Garmin-Cervelo’s tactical position, then the final piece of the puzzle was Vanmarcke’s escape prior to the Fabian Cancellara move that pulled out Thor Hushovd and Allessandro Ballan. Vanmarcke’s move – “I’ll go up the road. Join me later” – allowed let Thor recover and gave Garmin the strength to keep their powerful hand stable and have the race play out how they wanted it to. Vanmarcke is a graduate of Topsport-Vlaanderen, like other rising star Thomas de Gendt. Look for him in the future.

An Omega Pharma-Lotto domestique, Jelle Vanendert had a banner spring, with 13th at Amstel Gold and 6th at la Fleche Wallone. He was the OPL with Gilbert at the end of the Ardennes Classics, putting in the final sacrificial work to secure Gilbert’s historic four-win week-plus (Brabantse Pijl, Amstel Gold, Fleche Wallone, and Liege-Bastogne-Liege). Gilbert has long had the full commitment of capable domestiques; this spring, Vanendert was foremost among them.

As a side note, we would like to award a new award, the “Sep Vanmarcke Award for Result for a Rider On a Little-Known Belgian Team,” named for one of this year’s Unsung Heroes for his performance in last year’s Ghent-Wevelgem, which left some fans reading the results wondering, who? This award goes to Staf Scheirlinckx of a team called Veranda’s Willems-Accent. Scheirlinckx tenaciously clung to a group of favorites in de Ronde and squeezed out 8th place, a standout result in a career of supporting other riders.

Most Disappointing Team

They also won the award for Best Team this spring, though not without controversy. But when you form a superteam, expectations are different. Due to the amount of hype and expectation hat was generated by the creation and unveiling of Leopard-Trek, and the fact that they did not live up to that expectation during the Classics Season, Leopard-Trek does indeed win Most Disappointing Team. With a count of a single victory at E3 Prijs, the disappointment coming from the team and some of its riders has been obvious. Cancellara, riding with what looked like the form of his life, was unable to successfully defend his Paris-Roubaix or Ronde victories from 2010. He even crashed in the Ardennes Classics, which surprised even his teammates, who know best Cancellara’s reputation for being a superb bike-handler. All in all, this year could have gotten off to a much better start for the team from Luxembourg, who doubtless would like to take that next step to the top of the podium. Will they take revenge in July?

Most Disappointing Manager

The award for Most Disappointing Manager goes to Jonathan Vaughters of Garmin-Cervelo. In many of the races that the newly formed team competed in, their tactics were extremely negative and arguably detrimental to the overall appearance of the race itself. Though the thin barriers between fans and teams (thanks to sites like Twitter) allowed Vaughters to defend himself, and though it’s often said that there is no such thing as bad press, it seemed for much of the Spring that Garmin-Cervelo had an uncertain hand on the tiller – a flexible, nuanced leader when they needed a firm hand and a kick in the pants. In addition, due to the new initiative by the Belgian TV company Sporza.be, who placed cameras and microphones inside the team cars, Vaughters was heard to be giving his riders negative orders and failed to impress the fans at all. As such a strong team, we would have expected more aggressive racing from them, more attacking, more hard riding, more gutsy moves at the right times; if Vaughters has told his riders to race aggressively and make the race themselves instead of waiting and following, another manager would be claiming this award.

Best Race

The decision for this award was hard fought, with two contenders which seemed to be level-pegging, but one finally showed itself to be a worthy winner: The Tour of Flanders. This race was an aggressive race, with attacks, tactics, drama, mistakes, suffering, and an unexpected winner – what more could a spectator possibly ask for from a race? Cancellara was the favorite entering this race, and he raced in a way that left no room for doubt that he wanted to live up to those expectations. When he attacked, Boonen was unable to follow, leaving the Swiss Express to power away from the group of favorites. However, Quick-Step had a blessing that day in the form of Sylvian Chavanel. As the Frenchman had attacked earlier, he was in front of Cancellara, and allowed himself to be caught by the motoring Cancellara. Here came the tactics: he proceeded to sit in and do no work, for why should he? This may have had more of a psychological effect than a physical one on Cancellara, who was unable to achieve a solo victory. In the end, the race came down to a sprint from a group of three riders; Cancellara, Chavanel and the Belgian, Saxo-Bank’s Nick Neuyens. It did not dawn on me – and, I wonder, anybody else – whilst watching the coverage of the race that Neuyens was in with a chance of the win until he crossed the line, but he raced sensibly and economically which meant that he did not over-exert himself and was able to claim the win. Overall, we feel that this race was the most exciting, unexpected, dynamic and thrilling shocker of the Classics Season. Is it possible to disagree? Let us know.

Worst Race

Is it possible for us to write anything in here? This post is steadily populating with some critical awards; fortunately, we’re in the position of feeling that this was one of the most exciting Spring Classics campaigns in recent memory. Did any race fail to entertain? We cannot award this category to any race; feel free to submit your nominations below.

Most Interesting Sub-Plot

The Classics were doubly interesting this year because of the imminent shake-up of two stand-out teams, Omega Pharma-Lotto, which had a highlight-filled spring with Gilbert’s Ardennes Triple+, and QuickStep-Innergetic, which struggled throughout the season to live up to expectations. The contracts of both teams’ star riders are expiring at the end of 2011, leaving us wondering – where will Phillipe Gilbert and Tom Boonen wind up? Furthermore, reports of sponsor-splitting and the creation of new alliances complicate the affair.

That wraps up our coverage of the Spring Classics this year. As always, thanks for joining us. What captured your attention this Spring?

Posted in Featured | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment